Talk:ProjectItem - Revision history

Wiebe CARYA: /* .ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit. */

2021-07-14T09:37:31Z

.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 14 July 2021
Line 14:		Line 14:
	.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.--[[User:Wiebe CARYA\|Wiebe CARYA]] ([[User talk:Wiebe CARYA\|talk]]) 14:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)		.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.--[[User:Wiebe CARYA\|Wiebe CARYA]] ([[User talk:Wiebe CARYA\|talk]]) 14:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
	: Both LV2019SP1 (32-bit) and LV2021b10 (32-bit) return <code>{64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113}</code> for class private data and <code>{D60740D6-F254-4BBC-5675-8858F35B810E}</code> for .ctl, .ctt, .vi, etc. as listed on this page. Can you confirm that this is not a private data control? --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 19:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)		: Both LV2019SP1 (32-bit) and LV2021b10 (32-bit) return <code>{64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113}</code> for class private data and <code>{D60740D6-F254-4BBC-5675-8858F35B810E}</code> for .ctl, .ctt, .vi, etc. as listed on this page. Can you confirm that this is not a private data control? --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 19:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
			:: Ah, :palmface: Yes, those are class private data ctls.

Logmanoriginal: /* .ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.*/ Could this be a private data control?

2021-07-10T19:11:40Z

.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.: Could this be a private data control?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 10 July 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)		:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

			== .ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit. ==
	.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.--[[User:Wiebe CARYA\|Wiebe CARYA]] ([[User talk:Wiebe CARYA\|talk]]) 14:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)		.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.--[[User:Wiebe CARYA\|Wiebe CARYA]] ([[User talk:Wiebe CARYA\|talk]]) 14:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
			: Both LV2019SP1 (32-bit) and LV2021b10 (32-bit) return <code>{64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113}</code> for class private data and <code>{D60740D6-F254-4BBC-5675-8858F35B810E}</code> for .ctl, .ctt, .vi, etc. as listed on this page. Can you confirm that this is not a private data control? --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 19:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiebe CARYA: /* Thoughts on combining Pages */

2021-07-09T14:39:50Z

Thoughts on combining Pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 9 July 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)		:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

	.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.		.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.--[[User:Wiebe CARYA\|Wiebe CARYA]] ([[User talk:Wiebe CARYA\|talk]]) 14:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiebe CARYA: /* Thoughts on combining Pages */

2021-07-09T14:39:01Z

Thoughts on combining Pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 9 July 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)		::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
	:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)		:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

			.ctl (presumably .ctt) give {64A9BF48-4C55-45DB-8F18-9C796DA0C113} for me in LabVIEW 2020 64 bit.

Logmanoriginal: /* Thoughts on combining Pages */ I agree

2020-06-07T20:00:46Z

Thoughts on combining Pages: I agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 7 June 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)		: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
	::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)		::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
			:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Q at 17:46, 7 June 2020

2020-06-07T17:46:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 7 June 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	--[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
	: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)		: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
			::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Logmanoriginal: /* Thoughts on combining Pages */ My thoughts

2020-05-09T18:23:21Z

Thoughts on combining Pages: My thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 9 May 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	What are some ideas on the best way to combine this information? Because it should be accessible from the pages listed above (as well as others), I suggest this page is renamed to "Type String" and linked to from the other pages.		What are some ideas on the best way to combine this information? Because it should be accessible from the pages listed above (as well as others), I suggest this page is renamed to "Type String" and linked to from the other pages.
	--[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
			: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Q: Started discussion to reduce duplication.

2020-05-09T04:53:53Z

Started discussion to reduce duplication.

New page

== Thoughts on combining Pages ==
This page is similar to the pages:
*[[ProjectItem class]]
*[[ProjectItem class/Type String property]]
*[[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]

What are some ideas on the best way to combine this information? Because it should be accessible from the pages listed above (as well as others), I suggest this page is renamed to "Type String" and linked to from the other pages.
--[[User:Q|Q]] ([[User talk:Q|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 7 June 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)		: I think the first part should go into [[ProjectItem class]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]], respectively. The table belongs to both [[ProjectItem class/Type String property]] and [[ProjectItem class/Get All Descendents method]]. I don't think it should be copied under both. Instead, maybe put it under one of them and link from the other. I assume this is what the LabVIEW help does as well. --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
	::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)		::I'm starting to re-think this decision now that I am seeing almost the exact same table in the [[Project Explorer]] page too. Maybe there needs to be a ProjectItem page with the Type String and Type GUID table that the rest refers/links to. --[[User:Q\|Q]] ([[User talk:Q\|talk]]) 17:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
			:::This is probably the best compromise, especially considering that the table can be used for other purposes as well (i.e. manually editing type data). --[[User:Logmanoriginal\|Logmanoriginal]] ([[User talk:Logmanoriginal\|talk]]) 20:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)